
I am one of many people who support the growing “Boycott BP” movement. Obviously the oil spill is a huge tragedy, but moreover, I believe the company’s response has been pathetic at best, evil at worst. Using boycotts as a form of protest is nothing new, and no one really can be sure that it will have an effect on a giant oil-sucking corporation. However, since we consumers cast a vote every time we make a purchase, it makes sense not to vote for such a company.
In response to the Boycott BP movement, however, Newsweek chided activists for punishing all the mom-and-pop gas stations who only supply the BP product but are not directly owned by BP. They reason that a boycott is not an effective way to punish BP or make any kind of statement, because it doesn’t do enough to their bottom line, and suggest bugging the politicians instead. Fine, yes, do contact your representatives as well. I’m not suggesting that government regulations are not also to blame here, because obviously that’s a big part of the problem. But I disagree with Newsweek on the issue of boycotting the end-point gas stations, and here’s why:
The whole point of free market capitalism is that consumers determine what is successful in the marketplace. Lets say Company X makes mattresses and sells to mom-and-pop mattress stores all across the country. If the mattresses are good quality, comfortable, and reasonably priced, you can bet that consumers will buy them, and both Company X and mom-and-pop will profit. However, if the mattresses are cheap quality, with springs poking your back, and are made of potentially toxic materials, consumers won’t be so eager to buy them. Duh.
So mom-and-pop now have a bunch of crappy mattresses from Company X that they can’t sell. They will stop placing orders with Company X and find a new supplier with a better product. Yes, they may lose money in the short term, but that’s capitalism. Every business gambles when they buy product to resell. In the big picture, after enough stores stop ordering from Company X, they will be forced to either a) improve their products and practices, or b) go out of business. Yes, people will lose jobs. Yes, that’s sad. But is the consumer responsible for paying the salary of everyone involved in the making of a crappy product, or on the payroll of a corrupt company simply because if they don’t buy the product, the company may go out of business?
If we boycott BP supplying gas stations, whether owned by BP or not, it will affect them. It will also affect all of the people who buy gas from them to resell, and that’s capitalism. It forces business owners to ask harder questions before getting into bed with a supplier, and that’s how the free market improves. These mom-and-pop gas stations will start buying from another company, and just have to cross their fingers that their new supplier has learned from BP’s mistakes. Feel free to tell these business owners why you won’t buy from them, but reserve your anger for BP itself.
Moreover, a boycott will continue to push people towards supporting research and development of greener fuels and technologies. Someone with capital to invest may see this anger as incentive to gamble $500 million in a new R & D project, or in a green start up. Plus, if enough dissent builds, BP backlash could persuade some of the other oil companies to examine their own practices (because lets face it, they’re all f!#@ing evil).
We in the USA are not communists, and despite a lot of hysterics on the far right, neither are we socialists. If you can’t stomach the possibility that people will lose their jobs in our free market economy, maybe you should consider relocating. Always remember that your purchases speak for you. BP brands to boycott include Castrol, Arco, Aral, am/pm, Amoco, Wild Bean Cafe and, Safeway gas.
Several area gas stations cover up “BP” on signs – News – The Times-Tribune.
Newsweek’s latest anti-boycott article which overall makes some very good points about the evils of all oil companies and the necessity for government interference. But doesn’t a public outcry against BP also speak to the government? Just wait and see how many politicians use anti-BPisms in their campaigns in November.